Crypto Redditors argue over whether or not holding LINK for the long term

30 Jun, 2019 | Updated: 30 Jun, 2019
by Fifi Arisandi
Crypto Redditors argue over whether or not holding LINK for the long term

A Reddit post that warn crypto investors not to hold Chainlink long term receives many comments from the crypto community. 

Chainlink (LINK) has been on the news recently due to its extremely bullish move. As Chepicap reported just hours ago, it gained by 100% within 48 hours, which brought the price to $4 from $2.

Many crypto traders highlighted LINK’s performance and have been tweeting about it for some time.

On the contrary, a crypto enthusiast made a post on Reddit to warn everyone not to hold LINK for the long term.

User Colorsdontlie, who claimed to be a developer did a research on the hot crypto and came up with a conclusion to not use Chainlink for “my own apps”.

“I'm a developer and I looked over the Chainlink white paper and documentation, as well as the blog post by Google,” he opened his statement.

He then listed down 4 reasons why he wouldn’t use it, as follow:

1. The current "mainnet" is not decentralized. there's no way to decentrally assess if an oracle is any good or not.

2. It took them 2 years to basically build centralized oracles, which is extremely unimpressive (and already exists). I do not have much hope for the future or the competency of their engineers.

3. The white paper doesn't coherently describe how they plan on making their centralized design decentralized one day. They broadly go over their "decentralized" reputation strategies as if creating sybil resistant decentralized reputation is something of an afterthought, when it's actually an unsolved computer science problem. They've had 2-3 years and 30mil in funding to actually publish technical specifications for this and instead they decided to build trivial centralized oracles. Extremely worrying. It kind of reminds me of IOTA "we'll remove the coordinator later". No you won't. You don't know how.

4. News outlet and journalists keep reporting on "partnerships" with Google and Swift. But if you actually read the source for the "partnership", it's just a blog post by Google Cloud that promotes their own service (BigQuery) and shows an example about how Chainlink users can use Google Cloud if they want. In no way is Google partnered or planning on using Chainlink themselves. The Chainlink codebase is extremely trivial to rebuild if Google wanted to get into the blockchain oracle space.

“While there's certainly profits to be made by trading Chainlink, I recommend you do not HODL it with the hope that one day developers will adopt it as their source for decentralized oracles. That certainly won't happen,” he closed his statement.

The thread receives many comments from the other crypto enthusiasts, 245 comments as of writing time.

The responses vary and are inconclusive. There are those who agree, those who disagree with the approach taken to come up with the statement, and those who compare it with the other cryptocurrencies, such as TRON and Bitcoin SV.






Stick with Chepicap for more updates from the crypto space.

Follow Chepicap now on Twitter, YouTubeTelegram and Facebook!

Read more about: Chainlink (LINK)


Hodling LINK for the long term?

(69 votes)

Add a comment

Check out the latest news

You will be logged out and redirected to the homepage